It is an operational self-assessment, not a compliance certification or formal audit. The score does not establish compliance with any law, regulation, or standard.
Check each statement that is true today
Your result
Resources for your weaker areas
How to use the result
Use the questions to start a conversation with engineering, operations, quality, controls, and the people who actually retrieve or change Recipe values. Different roles often see different parts of the same process.
A lower score does not mean the plant is poorly run. It signals that knowledge or control may depend on manual discipline, individual people, or disconnected files. A high score does not prove that every Recipe is correct. It means the listed controls are consistently present.
| Score | Result | Practical interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 12 to 15 | Strong control | Core ownership, workflow, validation, and history controls are generally present. |
| 8 to 11 | Some controls are in place | The process has useful structure, with specific gaps worth addressing. |
| 4 to 7 | Important Recipe-control gaps | Current values or decisions may be hard to verify consistently. |
| 0 to 3 | Recipe knowledge may depend heavily on people and files | Start by defining ownership and identifying one Current approved source. |
See how Summit approaches these controls
Summit provides a structured model for Recipes, Versions, Parameters, requests, approvals, comparisons, and history. It does not directly control production equipment.
Request a demo